IBS

The exercise was created 13.03.2024 by millamiver. Anzahl Fragen: 60.




Fragen wählen (60)

Normally, all words in an exercise is used when performing the test and playing the games. You can choose to include only a subset of the words. This setting affects both the regular test, the games, and the printable tests.

All None

  • ___ allow the firms to redeploy its resources to respond to contingencies created in its external environment. By swiftly responding to these opportunities, firms can achieve a competitive advantage and fight off competitors. dynamic capabilities
  • ___ are specific abilities or areas of expertise that the firm possess which forms the basis of its competitive advantage core competencies
  • A framework that determines the competitive behavior of firms or more specifcally the drivers behind competteive behavior Awareness, Motivation, Capability
  • Factors Influencing market entry (1): he extent to which less powerful members of organizations and institutions (including the family) accept and expect unequal power distributions. Positive relation to WOS as entry mode Cultural power distance
  • Factors Influencing market entry (2): Relates to market size and growth; negaitve correlation due to good markets have better protection, IP and coordination with local firms Market Attractiveness
  • Factors Influencing market entry (3): Country risk and legal protection have a negative correlation with WOS --> due to financial risk that firms must take
  • Factors Influencing market entry (4a): Income level for manufacturing companies, have a positive relation to WOS as an entry mode
  • Factors Influencing market entry (4a): Income level for service companies, have a negative correlation because they prefer to use cooperative entry mode
  • Framework that explains if a firm should internationalize or not and if so how OLI
  • Framework that explain that firms face two pressures in their evironment that impact strategy: global integration and local repsonsiveness - it framework is called integration-responsiveness framework
  • Global Strategy (1): The act of using a company's assets to address customers needs/positions itself in market against competitors Value Creation
  • Global Strategy (2): The act of how a company is sells is products/services along with how the entire value chain is positioned Value Delivery
  • Global Strategy (3): How a firm capitalizes on its value delivery - more complex in a global setting; consider tariffs + exchange fluctuations Value Capture
  • Governance Types GVC (1): This governance type is characterized by transactions and low switching costs. Market
  • Governance Types GVC (2): the supplier is responsible for entire production process and uses generic machinery with low asset specificity. Modular
  • Governance Types GVC (3): GVC where complex relationships between buyers and suppliers. Asset specificity and mutual dependency is high while relationships are managed through mutual trust and reputation. relational
  • Governance Types GVC (4): value chains are characterized by a lead firm with access to many suppliers competing against each other. These suppliers face large switching costs and are therefore considered captive by the larger buyer Captive
  • Governance Types GVC (5): Vertical Integration; Managers have control over the process and down to the subsidiary level. hierarchy (internalization)
  • How are capabilities formed? Assets working together
  • Mintzbergs 5Ps (1): Strategy can be congifured as an intednded course of action Plan
  • Mintzbergs 5Ps (2): Stratgy is configured to outsmart it's competitors Ploy
  • Mintzbergs 5Ps (3): Constant stream of actions undertaken by the firm Pattern
  • Mintzbergs 5Ps (4): Strategy is ___ aimed at matching the firm with its external and internal enviroment Positioned
  • Mintzbergs 5Ps (5): Strategy is a ___ shared by members of an organisation: some see the world as changing --> pursue new products, others see stable --> protection Perspective
  • OLI (1): Refers to the competetive advanatge that is specific to the firm Ownership advantage
  • OLI (2): Advanatge that is tied to the specific place the firm want to internationalize Location
  • OLI (3): The decision of wheter to use the market or leverage internal hirarchy - if the ownership advanatge for control and ability outweighs transaction costs the firm will establish WHO Internalization
  • RBV: The model states that resources are heterogenous and immobile implying that not all firms in a market posesses the same resources
  • Refers to a subsidiaries ability to make decisions on its own without input or restrictions imposed by the HQ. Subsidiary autonomy
  • simultaneous competition and cooperation between global rivals coopetition
  • Subsidiary autonomy and structural context (1): are geographically constrained and a constrained product and value-added scope. Its primary role is to adapt the firm’s product to the needs of the local market. local implementers
  • Subsidiary autonomy and structural contexts (2): ossess distinctive expertise in certain functional areas. These activities are coordinated with other subsidiaries, leading to higher interdependence and a narrow set of value activities performed special contributors
  • Subsidiary autonomy and structural contexts (3): has a global or regional responsibility and cooperates with the HQ to develop and implement the firm’s strategy. It often is responsible for an entire product line or business with an unconstrained range of value adding activities world mandate
  • Subsidiary role (1a): Competence and strategic imporatnce is high the subsidiary will take on the role of strategic leader
  • Subsidiary role (1b): In this role the subsidiary aid HQ in developing and implementing its strategy strategic leader
  • Subsidiary role (2a): he subsidiary is competent but strategic importance is low, the firm will take on a contributor role
  • Subsidiary role (2b): In this role the subsidiary possesses distinctive capabilities that can be utilized in other markets as well contributor role
  • Subsidiary role (3a): if competence is low but the strategic importance is high, a subsidiary will be considered a black hole
  • Subsidiary role (3b): In this role It is not able to compete in the market and instead the firm should focus on exiting the market without wasting more money in trying to compete. black hole
  • Subsidiary role (4a): If both importance and competence are low, the subsidiary is seen as an implementer
  • Subsidiary role (4b): It is able to compete in the local market and the focus should be on achieving economies of scale and earning profits. implementer
  • Theory that argues at how embedded the firm is in the network and how repeated interactions can build mutual trust within the network swedish network theory
  • Theory that argues that a firm can gain a competitive advantage through its position within the network: present where two nodes are not directly connected to each other. structural hole theory
  • Theory that explains what stratgy is Mintzbergs 5Ps
  • Theory that refers to the monetary and non-monetary costs of establishing operations either through contracts or internal hirarcy Transaction cost theory
  • Theory that suggests that firms can achive a competetive advantage through its human, intagiable, and tangible resources resource-based-view
  • The seven strategies firms can deploy to manage GVC are ... (s, n/n-m s, j s, r c, m f, e v d) Selectivity, non-profit organizations/non-market strategies, joint strategizing, relational capital, multilateral feedback, equitable value distribution
  • The three different dimensions of global competition that impact pressures for global firms are... buyer-related, industry rivalry, general forces
  • The VIRO framework states that firms can develop a sustainable competetive advanatge by controling resources that are valuable, rare, difficult or impossible to imitate and not substitutable
  • Three parts that influence the subsidiaries role ocal implementer, the special contributor and world mandate
  • Transaction Cost Theory (1): Characterized by the premise that non all information is know when entering into a transactional relationship. Bounded rational
  • Transaction Cost Theory (2): Characterized by the fact that certain assets will be less productive outside the relationship or for another purpouse Asset specificity
  • Transaction Cost Theory (3): refers to the fact that one party claims excess value at the determent of other. E. braking contracts and enhancing preassure for more comprehensive opportunistic behaviour
  • Transaction Cost Theory (4): last piece that can be both behavioural (associated with monotoring) and enviromental (changes to the external enviroment) uncertainty
  • Which theory is based on the premise that if the cost of using the market is less than cost of using internal hirarcy is grater the firm will internalize? Transaction cost theory
  • Theory that argues that the structure of an individuals network can create a competetive advanatge Structural hole theory
  • ____ are gaps between non-redundant contacts, that allows the briding individual to benefit from unique porsitions Structural Holes
  • The main importance in the structural hole theory is optimal positioning
  • Theory that explains that partners in a network engage in a social exchange process over time, building mutual trust, from the TCT perspective Swedish network approach
  • The embeddedness in the Swedish network are based on the following criterias (c, p, s, c) Cognitive, Political, Structural, Cultural

All None

(
Freigegebene Übung

https://spellic.com/ger/abfrage/ibs.11984173.html

)